Filling out my startup canvas on Monday, I buzzed along until I arrived at the “Unfair Advantage” section. Obviously, I think I’m developing a great product or else I wouldn’t be  spending all this time; I have phenomenal writers, photographers, multimedia journalists, developers and thinkers onboard, who have created content for some of the best names in the business. And we’ve already put our talents to work with regard to developing stories. BUT…who’s to say someone else can’t come along with a talented group of journos and do something similar — ostensibly hijacking our advantage? Facebook arguably had a sort of secret recipe in its infancy, which would have protected it from competition, and by the time those would-be competitors wised up, the network effect had set in and FB was too far gone. “Unfair Advantage” if I’ve ever seen one…

I certainly hope that I can develop my product and brand to a point where we’ve become the top purveyor in our particular niche, providing the most engaging and satisfying experience for our community, but who’s to say someone else can’t rip us off before we get there? Then again, maybe two cooks in the kitchen isn’t necessarily a bad thing? Maybe such a cook-off translates into a “Top Chef”-style situation in which both cooks are innovating to such a high and unseen level that the beneficiaries of their cuisine won’t even know what hit them?

I’m eager to talk and think more about the issue of advantage, particularly when we’re dealing with journalistic projects that don’t necessarily center on some next-level technological advancement — when the innovation is in the content and its delivery, and not in any underlying I.P.-heavy bells and whistles.